|
楼主 |
发表于 2008-3-22 01:26
|
显示全部楼层
有一些评论也很不错.值得一看
The Centro giveth and the Centro taketh hkklife @ 3/20/2008 7:39:41 : V8 v S) x5 ]1 `8 L
* N: w6 U2 B/ R- o! L$ q- q3 L3 W) }* g2 t+ `! T. ^$ @/ m
* D; }2 H+ _6 j& O* n- h' r. F' POfcourse Palm's new products are keyboard-based! Do we REALLY expectanything else other than SSS (small square screens) from them? Ofcourse we don't!As far as Colligan's complaints (declines in thehandheld business, Palm's aging Windows Mobile product line & thelower than average selling price of the Centro), ALL of that is theirfault.4 P/ J) a" _7 G w/ ?4 [7 ?; l
2 P, ?3 S/ H$ c8 p/ T- N#1 Had Palm not totally abandoned the handheld market ina fenzy of greed to cozy up to the carriers (namely Sprint &Verizon) they'd still be treading water, even if they had kept tweakingthe same 3 (or even 2) existing PDA formfactors/price points.
+ w! l8 `7 S$ T! u) x8 \! \+ v3 E2 @; u$ o% ^! m
#2Aging WM line? Again, entirely Palm's fault. To not be the firstcompany out of the gates with a 320x320 WM6 smartphone is just absurd.The 755p formfactor would have made for an ideal first WM6 device. Oh,what's that you say? The carriers didn't comission a 320x320 WM6 CDMATreo from Palm? Oh well, that's what you get by selling your soul tothe carriers and then repeatedly bungling one release after another.
' n& V3 s. M2 O8 O7 E
' v2 M5 S( j7 P, x" I: X, x7 ~& M3 Q#3Lower than average selling price of the Centro? Again, entirely Palm'sfault. Had they not tried to sell the SAME smartphone 3x in a row (Treo700p, 755p, Centro) perhaps they could have commanded a higher price.Or even (GASP!) tried to introduce SOME compelling new hardware featureon the Centro to make it worthy of a higher price (128mb RAM, 2mpcamera, 2/4gb internal flash screen are all perfectly functional underGarnet). Heck, a 3.5mm stereo headphone jack would have given theCentro SOMETHING that the other Treos do not have. Instead, thatpitiful stock battery and tiny scren & keyboard aren't worthy of apremium pricetag and everyone (including the carriers) knows it.
' v( y. E( `+ v3 a& z4 h
5 q% @ F! u' M' n#4.Oh, and the Treo 500 not selling well in Europe? That's Palm's faultfor comissioning a "me too" device that isn't even quad-band so it canbe sold in the US. Quite foolish if you ask me. Heck, had Palm just hada quiet 500v launch in the US and sold it through AT&T as a WMversion of the Centro (or, as a Moto Q competitor) or even justunlocked on their website it'd at least have gotten SOME attention. Andan utter lack of differentiating features over every other WM phone onthe market doesn't help matters either.
8 r4 N8 }% r a0 Q- q5 k1 R" R; \( p2 G/ N9 D
" D' u( g# ` t. Y( w" n
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
: W% |8 W: q/ q
0 o+ O: J4 A( ^$ ~& m$ ?% ]1 dHas-been smartphone maker Palm is having some luck selling itscheap, tiny Centro smartphone at Sprint (S) and AT&T (T): It helpedthe company sell a record 833,000 phones last quarter, up 13%year-over-year.+ r* Y D: n- C
$ m( W8 `9 K" E- s5 ~# p4 `& ?
+ f% v5 j: s5 r I1 b
But business still stinks: The company swung to aloss and missed the Street's sales and EPS projections. Palm (PALM)shares are down 6% in after-hours trading - at $4.45, they're just 20cents above their 52-week low.
* h/ g9 _$ N& {. C8 S( v; r' k' I/ X. `7 I/ H4 a8 x
Palm (PALM) posted $312.1 millionof sales, down 24% year-over-year and missing the Street's $315.3million consensus. Adjusted EPS came in at a 16 cents per share loss,below the Street's expected 15 cents per share loss. And the companyreported a $31.5 million net loss, a huge drop from its $11.8 millionQ3 profit a year ago.
) U8 f9 `) U1 i: l8 w, f* Ihttp://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/3/palm_q3_swings_to_loss_misses_on_sales_eps |
|