|
楼主 |
发表于 2008-3-22 01:26
|
显示全部楼层
有一些评论也很不错.值得一看
The Centro giveth and the Centro taketh hkklife @ 3/20/2008 7:39:41 0 y$ \1 M, r" G# c6 G: s$ [2 K/ |
( w- W C2 {/ J2 u o, d2 k# c% K7 V; O9 l, T- i# [- z; k9 D
! \7 q9 `( E" J9 [0 y9 Z2 j" v
Ofcourse Palm's new products are keyboard-based! Do we REALLY expectanything else other than SSS (small square screens) from them? Ofcourse we don't!As far as Colligan's complaints (declines in thehandheld business, Palm's aging Windows Mobile product line & thelower than average selling price of the Centro), ALL of that is theirfault.
2 t* A7 L* `: n$ ]0 O; _# U2 n3 @; u3 ?, i6 [3 h9 u# S
#1 Had Palm not totally abandoned the handheld market ina fenzy of greed to cozy up to the carriers (namely Sprint &Verizon) they'd still be treading water, even if they had kept tweakingthe same 3 (or even 2) existing PDA formfactors/price points.# t# a$ ~- f# U+ _
! t7 u" Q! A0 [7 r#2Aging WM line? Again, entirely Palm's fault. To not be the firstcompany out of the gates with a 320x320 WM6 smartphone is just absurd.The 755p formfactor would have made for an ideal first WM6 device. Oh,what's that you say? The carriers didn't comission a 320x320 WM6 CDMATreo from Palm? Oh well, that's what you get by selling your soul tothe carriers and then repeatedly bungling one release after another.
* t2 e6 a/ X3 t1 @# ^$ h4 y5 O% ~
#3Lower than average selling price of the Centro? Again, entirely Palm'sfault. Had they not tried to sell the SAME smartphone 3x in a row (Treo700p, 755p, Centro) perhaps they could have commanded a higher price.Or even (GASP!) tried to introduce SOME compelling new hardware featureon the Centro to make it worthy of a higher price (128mb RAM, 2mpcamera, 2/4gb internal flash screen are all perfectly functional underGarnet). Heck, a 3.5mm stereo headphone jack would have given theCentro SOMETHING that the other Treos do not have. Instead, thatpitiful stock battery and tiny scren & keyboard aren't worthy of apremium pricetag and everyone (including the carriers) knows it.
% f' R$ ]% M& G! M& c; y; G T, D
! B7 J. N Y$ P1 q, ]; O: V9 F& C#4.Oh, and the Treo 500 not selling well in Europe? That's Palm's faultfor comissioning a "me too" device that isn't even quad-band so it canbe sold in the US. Quite foolish if you ask me. Heck, had Palm just hada quiet 500v launch in the US and sold it through AT&T as a WMversion of the Centro (or, as a Moto Q competitor) or even justunlocked on their website it'd at least have gotten SOME attention. Andan utter lack of differentiating features over every other WM phone onthe market doesn't help matters either.
6 S9 `, Y5 z M! ]* w! F
) N" f2 V$ z) q0 j! f% c
1 v3 K) W2 f% O# W---------------------------------------------------------------------------
& A: a* Y x. h$ q; f& ]" U# q6 R3 u8 W/ ^ p# h" y# l. \/ t: E
Has-been smartphone maker Palm is having some luck selling itscheap, tiny Centro smartphone at Sprint (S) and AT&T (T): It helpedthe company sell a record 833,000 phones last quarter, up 13%year-over-year.8 |2 I1 ?! \# G! t# e3 R% i
$ J. @* U& c- t
. q! T/ H, G" O7 p. l
But business still stinks: The company swung to aloss and missed the Street's sales and EPS projections. Palm (PALM)shares are down 6% in after-hours trading - at $4.45, they're just 20cents above their 52-week low.: L* B. P# C0 n
5 c- T& u* x( p0 h+ F
Palm (PALM) posted $312.1 millionof sales, down 24% year-over-year and missing the Street's $315.3million consensus. Adjusted EPS came in at a 16 cents per share loss,below the Street's expected 15 cents per share loss. And the companyreported a $31.5 million net loss, a huge drop from its $11.8 millionQ3 profit a year ago.
7 I7 w) R2 T) R8 ^' nhttp://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/3/palm_q3_swings_to_loss_misses_on_sales_eps |
|